Skip to main content

Tracing a Tornado’s Path of Destruction

A study led by NASA researchers demonstrated how SAR satellite data can be used to identify tornado tracks and supplement storm damage surveys.
Image
Image Caption

An EF4 tornado caused severe damage on March 3, 2020, in Putnam County, Tennessee. NASA researchers used synthetic aperture radar (SAR) technology to trace the path of this and eight other tornadoes generated by the same storm system. Credit: Putnam County Emergency Management

After a tornado moves through an area and the immediate emergencies are over, many people quickly begin to wonder exactly how strong the tornado was, where it went, and how much damage it left behind. Emergency managers need to understand the path of the tornado to begin to prioritize search-and-rescue and recovery efforts. Meteorologists want to know characteristics of the tornado damage—especially spatial extent and severity—as they try to improve tornado warnings through radar signatures and other remote sensing observations. Farmers need details on how bad the damage was so they can file a crop insurance claim. The list goes on.

The job of surveying a tornado track can be hampered by difficult terrain, bad weather, inaccessible locations, or multiple tornadoes crossing the same area. To make the complex task easier, remote sensing scientist Hannah Pankratz of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center–University of Alabama in Huntsville recently tried identifying tornado tracks using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data from satellites. She found the technique could be a way to quickly provide a broad view of a tornado’s path of destruction.

“Tornadoes can be terrifying and lead to significant damage, and we're using SAR to try and help partners improve our ability to map and respond to the damage,” said Pankratz.

Tools for Assessing the Damage

After the severe weather event is over, the damage assessment soon begins.

“We need to figure out the degree of damage and the extent, and whether it was from a tornado, straight line winds, or a downburst,” said Kristopher White, lead forecaster for the National Weather Service's Huntsville office.

As soon as reasonably possible, NWS forecasters like White go out into the community with a team of meteorologists to conduct ground surveys of the wreckage and to determine a tornado’s strength and path. The teams are often accompanied by local emergency managers, who have reports they’ve received from people affected by the storm. The survey process can last for days or even weeks for larger damage events.

The NWS categorizes tornadoes using the Enhanced Fujita (EF) scale to assess and rate the strength of tornadoes from EF0-5. Each intensity rating includes a range of wind speeds that correspond with the degree of damage they cause natural and built surroundings. The ratings are based upon detailed engineering studies and other observations that definitively link the observed damage to buildings, homes, and other structures with the wind necessary to cause such damage. For example, an EF0 tornado creates broken branches and other light damage consistent with 65 to 85 mph winds. A rare EF5 can blow entire houses off their foundations with winds over 200 mph.

Meteorologists use various tools to survey the aftermath, including special GIS-enabled software for recording and assessing storm damage, remote controlled drones (often supplied by emergency managers or contractors), and satellite data. The satellite data often come from optical, light-sensing sensors such as the Operational Land Imager (OLI) aboard Landsat satellites, the Multispectral Instrument (MSI) imager on the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Sentinel-2 spacecraft, and other data available through NASA's Commercial Satellite Data Acquisition Program (CSDA). 

OLI observations, for instance, can be used to create normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) products, which measure an area’s greenness and can reveal trails of decaying trees and other plants damaged by a tornado. NDVI products, however, have their limits. For one thing, changes in greenness are only apparent when plants and trees are full of leaves, making tornado paths harder to spot in late fall, winter, or early spring. It can also take days to weeks before plants wither and die enough to be detected from space. And clouds can block an optical sensor’s view of the ground, potentially keeping researchers from gathering any data at all when it is needed the most.

SAR, on the other hand, can detect changes immediately, acquiring data by day or night and in most weather conditions. Pankratz previously had success employing it in time-series analyses to measure subtle ground deformation from space. She was also aware of SAR being used in some other severe weather studies.

“SAR has previously been used to detect flooding, along with hail and wind damage,” said Pankratz. “I wanted to see if SAR’s specific ability to measure physical changes could be useful for identifying tornado tracks.”

Sensing the Changes

To test that application, Pankratz used SAR data from the ESA’s Sentinel-1A satellite to identify tornado damage tracks from the March 2-3, 2020, outbreak in Tennessee. (The data were provided by ESA through a partnership with the Alaskan Satellite Facility Distributed Active Archive Center.) During the outbreak, a long-lived supercell thunderstorm blew eastward across the state, spawning 13 tornadoes and significant wind and hail across 10 counties. The storm produced a combined total of 128 miles of identified tornado tracks. 

The study focused specifically on nine tornado tracks in the Memphis and Nashville areas because they were well-surveyed by the NWS and included a variety of EF ratings across a mixture of rural and urban areas.

Image
Image Caption

The study analyzed nine of 13 tornadoes with strengths of EF0 to EF4 that struck northern Tennessee on March 2-3, 2020. Credit: Pankratz et al. 2025

To find tornado damage paths in SAR data, Pankratz paired before and after data from the areas. The data were analyzed for linear ground features with lower coherence than their immediate surroundings. Coherence is a measure of how similar an area appears between multiple satellite passes. These low-coherence features were then labeled as possible tornado tracks and compared to the official NWS radar data and damage surveys. 

Image
Image Caption

Above are three sets of coherence images showing the tracks of the tornadoes produced by the storm as it crossed Tennessee. Each image section is labeled with the dates of the before and after data used to make the coherence image. Credit: Credit: Pankratz et al. 2025

Pankratz found that five of the nine tornadoes could be detected in the SAR imagery. The easiest tracks to identify had paths longer than 10 km and were rated EF2 or higher. On the other hand, no EF0 tornados were detectable because of the light damage they produced.

“When we looked at the SAR imagery, we were really impressed,” said Pankratz. “For one, we were happy to confirm our hypothesis that coherence could be used to see tracks at all. Secondly, they aligned really well with the National Weather Service assessments of ground damage. The results mean that SAR measurements are another dataset the NWS could incorporate into storm assessments.”

A Radar View of the Future

“The study shows that optical and the synthetic aperture radar data in combination offer a pretty comprehensive way to map a lot of storm damage,” said Andrew Molthan, manager for Earth and Planetary Science at NASA Marshall, former participant in NASA’s Disasters Program, and adviser to Pankratz when she was a postdoctoral researcher. 

“We’re entering a new age of synthetic aperture radar because it’s really good at showing us the structure of areas in all conditions, and we have years of C-band Sentinel-1 data,” Molthan added. “Now NISAR is becoming available with free, open, and global L-band data, offering a whole different perspective, with wavelengths and capabilities that could be used for tornado damage mapping.”

The NASA/ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite monitors large and small changes to Earth's surface from various forces, including severe weather and other natural hazards.

“In some situations, we believe NISAR’s L-band may contribute to other types of damage surveys where storms impact agriculture, as well as structural damage in our communities,” said Molthan. “Commercial partners are also providing SAR observations in diverse wavelengths and polarizations, which we are exploring with NASA’s Commercial Satellite Data Acquisition program.”

Molthan notes that responding to multiple, significant tornadoes can be such a broad, all-hands-on-deck emergency that NDVI, SAR, and many other kinds of data can be needed and useful.

White also sees the value of combining data and is intrigued by the idea of using SAR technology in surveys. Last year, he used data from OLI, drones, and ground surveys together to profile tornado damage and found the combination worked well. He imagines adding SAR data to the mix could make good results even better.

“The detail of SAR imagery could be very helpful in answering those questions when weather, difficult terrain, the size of an event, or logistics make it difficult to survey areas,” said White. “There’s little stopping a SAR satellite from seeing from above and likely getting us good data quicker.”

Referenced Datasets

Details

Last Updated

Aug. 7, 2026

Published

Aug. 7, 2026

Data Center/Project

Alaska Satellite Facility DAAC (ASF DAAC)